--- title: "B2B Ecommerce Replatforming: Why Most Migrations Fail Before Launch" description: B2B replatforming projects fail because teams scope them as technology projects. The four migration risk categories that protect revenue through the cutover. image: https://blog.miva.com/hubfs/b2b-ecommerce-replatforming.webp --- - [![Miva, Inc logo.](https://www.miva.com/images/logos/miva-type-white.svg)](https://www.miva.com) - ![White X close button](https://www.miva.com/images/svg/icons/icon-x-white.svg) - Why Choose Miva - Solutions - [Why Miva Simplify Complexity](https://www.miva.com/why-miva) - [Platform Overview A Complete Ecommerce Solution](https://www.miva.com/platform-overview) - [Miva Connect Real-time Native Connections](https://www.miva.com/miva-connect) - [Vexture AI-powered Product Discovery](https://www.miva.com/vexture) - [PageBuilder No-code Page Creation](https://www.miva.com/pagebuilder) - [MivaPay Flexible Native Payment Solution](https://www.miva.com/mivapay) - Business Type - [B2B Robust Business Tools Built-In](https://www.miva.com/b2b-ecommerce) - [B2C Designed for Agility](https://www.miva.com/b2c-ecommerce-platform) - [Hybrid B2B + B2C, All Managed Together](https://www.miva.com/b2b-dtc-ecommerce-platform) - [Enterprise](https://www.miva.com/enterprise-ecommerce-platform) - Resources - Community - [Customer Stories Case Studies and Featured Stores Built With Miva](https://www.miva.com/customer-stories) - [Technology Partners An Ecosystem Built for Flexibility](https://www.miva.com/partners) - [Agency Partners Helping You Build and Grow](https://www.miva.com/miva-agency-partners) - Resources - [Resource Center Browse Our Extensive Library](https://www.miva.com/ecommerce-strategy-resource-guides) - [Blog Explore Miva Insights on Ecommerce](https://blog.miva.com/) - [Documentation Answers for All Your Miva Questions](https://docs.miva.com/) - [Get Pricing](https://www.miva.com/schedule-demo-admin) [![Miva, Inc logo.](https://www.miva.com/images/logos/miva-type-white.svg)](https://www.miva.com) - Why Choose Miva - Solutions - [Why Miva Simplify Complexity](https://www.miva.com/why-miva) - [Platform Overview A Complete Ecommerce Solution](https://www.miva.com/platform-overview) - [Miva Connect Real-time Native Connections](https://www.miva.com/miva-connect) - [Vexture AI-powered Product Discovery](https://www.miva.com/vexture) - [PageBuilder No-code Page Creation](https://www.miva.com/pagebuilder) - [MivaPay Flexible Native Payment Solution](https://www.miva.com/mivapay) - Business Type - [B2B Robust Business Tools Built-In](https://www.miva.com/b2b-ecommerce) - [B2C Designed for Agility](https://www.miva.com/b2c-ecommerce-platform) - [Hybrid B2B + B2C, All Managed Together](https://www.miva.com/b2b-dtc-ecommerce-platform) [![](https://www.miva.com/images/webp/apex-stat.webp)](https://www.miva.com/case-studies/apex-tools) Your Partner for Growth See how Apex Tool drove a 57% revenue lift with Miva's Vexture® solution. - [Enterprise](https://www.miva.com/enterprise-ecommerce-platform) - Resources - Community - [Customer Stories Case Studies and Featured Stores Built With Miva](https://www.miva.com/customer-stories) - [Technology Partners An Ecosystem Built for Flexibility](https://www.miva.com/partners) - [Agency Partners Helping You Build and Grow](https://www.miva.com/miva-agency-partners) - Resources - [Resource Center Browse Our Extensive Library](https://www.miva.com/ecommerce-strategy-resource-guides) - [Blog Explore Miva Insights on Ecommerce](https://blog.miva.com/) - [Documentation Answers for All Your Miva Questions](https://docs.miva.com/) - [Get Pricing](https://www.miva.com/schedule-demo-admin) - ![White, three-lined, menu icon.](https://www.miva.com/images/svg/icons/icon-menu.svg) # B2B Ecommerce Replatforming: Why Most Migrations Fail Before Launch B2B replatforming projects fail because teams scope them as technology projects. The four migration risk categories that protect revenue through the cutover. By Lucinda Miller | October 13, 2026 ![](https://blog.miva.com/hubfs/b2b-ecommerce-replatforming.webp) ### Before You Read On... See why top ecommerce brands use Miva’s no-code platform to run multiple stores, manage massive catalogs, and grow their revenue. [Book a Demo of Miva](https://www.miva.com/schedule-demo-admin) Most B2B ecommerce replatforming projects are scoped as technology projects. They should not be. A technology project asks: how do we move our data, preserve our URLs, and replicate our features on the new platform? Those are legitimate questions, and answering them correctly matters. But they are not the questions that determine whether a B2B replatforming succeeds commercially. The questions that determine commercial success are different: how do we ensure that every buyer account retains its negotiated pricing on day one of launch? How do we confirm that every purchase approval workflow used by enterprise buyers is functional before we go live? How do we protect the organic search traffic that generates 40% of our inbound pipeline during a URL migration? Teams that scope replatforming as a technology project typically launch on time. They also spend the following 6 to 18 months recovering the revenue they had before they migrated. Teams that scope it as a business operations project, one that requires new technology to execute, protect revenue through the cutover and begin capturing the commercial upside of the new platform from week one. The distinction comes down to what gets validated before launch. The B2B Replatforming Risk Register below covers the four categories of risk that cause post-launch revenue problems, what goes wrong in each category when not addressed, and what validation looks like before cutover. ## The B2B Replatforming Risk Register The four risk categories below cover the most frequent causes of post-launch revenue disruption in B2B migrations. Each category has a distinct failure mode, a revenue impact that can be estimated before launch, and a pre-launch validation test that confirms readiness. A migration that clears all four validations is substantially less likely to experience a revenue decline in the first 90 days post-launch.   | **Risk category** | **What can go wrong** | **Revenue impact if unaddressed** | **How to validate before launch** | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Revenue Risk: Account structure and pricing | B2B buyers log in after migration and find their negotiated pricing has reverted to list price. Customer-specific catalogs are missing products. Account hierarchies that allowed multiple buyers under one billing account are flattened. | Buyers place fewer orders or no orders until pricing is corrected. High-value accounts contact sales instead of self-serving, increasing support cost. Some buyers assume the pricing change is intentional and begin evaluating alternatives. | Log in as 10 representative buyer accounts spanning different pricing tiers before launch. Verify negotiated pricing on at least 5 products per account. Confirm customer-specific catalog restrictions are intact. Confirm multi-buyer account hierarchies are functional. | | Workflow Risk: Buyer portal and approval flows | Purchase approval workflows that required manager sign-off before order submission are missing or reconfigured incorrectly. Buyers who expect to save and submit orders for approval submit them directly instead, creating unauthorized purchase orders. | Unauthorized orders increase. Buyers who rely on approval workflows cannot complete purchases until workflows are rebuilt. Enterprise accounts with procurement compliance requirements may suspend purchasing entirely until the workflow is verified. | Map every approval workflow in the legacy platform before migration begins. Build and test each workflow in the new environment using actual buyer accounts. Obtain written sign-off from the account contact at each enterprise account that uses approval routing before launch date. | | SEO and Traffic Risk: URL structure and redirect coverage | Product, category, and blog URLs change during migration. Redirects are incomplete or point to incorrect destination pages. Organic search rankings for high-value product and category pages drop because search engines cannot follow the redirect chain. | Organic traffic to product and category pages drops 20% to 60% in the first 90 days post-launch, depending on redirect coverage. Recovery to pre-migration traffic levels takes 6 to 18 months. Revenue from organic search-sourced sessions falls proportionally. | Export every indexed URL from the legacy platform before migration. Map each URL to its new destination. Test the redirect chain for every URL before launch using an automated crawler. Confirm no redirect chains longer than two hops exist. Monitor Google Search Console for coverage errors in the first 30 days post-launch. | | Integration Risk: ERP, EDI, and third-party connections | ERP connections that push inventory levels, order status, and pricing updates to the storefront are not rebuilt or tested under load. EDI integrations for key accounts stop transmitting order confirmations. Third-party shipping APIs return errors on the new platform. | Inventory displayed on the storefront becomes inaccurate within hours of launch. Orders placed by EDI accounts generate no confirmation, causing buyers to resubmit orders or contact customer service. Shipping calculation errors cause orders to be placed with incorrect freight costs. | Inventory a complete list of every integration connecting the legacy platform to external systems. Assign a technical owner to each integration. Run each integration in a parallel test environment against real transaction volume before the cutover date. Do not launch until every integration has processed at least 100 test transactions without error. | *The B2B Replatforming Risk Register. Each category represents a distinct failure mode that produces post-launch revenue impact. Validating all four before cutover is the difference between a migration that protects revenue and one that recovers it.* ## Why account structure and pricing is the highest-stakes risk in B2B migration B2B pricing is not a product attribute. It is a relationship attribute. A buyer who has a negotiated price of $47.50 for a product listed at $89.00 is not interacting with a pricing rule. They are relying on a commercial agreement that took months to establish, is tied to their account contract, and determines whether they can meet their own cost targets when reselling or consuming what they purchase. When that pricing reverts to list price on the first day of a new platform's launch, the buyer does not see a technical error. They see a broken relationship. The recovery conversation involves customer success, sales leadership, and often the buyer's procurement team. The resolution timeline is measured in days or weeks, not hours. For this reason, [B2B ecommerce pricing strategy](https://blog.miva.com/b2b-ecommerce-pricing-strategy) must be validated at the account level, not the rule level, before any B2B platform goes live. The validation process is not complicated. It requires someone to log in as representative buyers across pricing tiers, add products to cart, and confirm that the price displayed matches the contracted price for that account. What makes this step consistently skipped is project scope: technical teams validate that pricing rules migrated correctly, then assume buyer-level pricing is therefore correct. It often is not. Customer group assignments, account-specific overrides, and contract pricing structures that existed as customizations on the legacy platform require explicit rebuilding and explicit validation on the new one. Customer-specific catalog restrictions carry equal risk. A buyer who can only purchase from a subset of the catalog, either because of geographic restrictions, regulatory requirements, or product line exclusivity agreements, needs to see the correct catalog on login. A [B2B customer portal](https://blog.miva.com/b2b-ecommerce-customer-portal) that presents the full catalog to a buyer with restricted access creates compliance exposure, not just a user experience problem. This is a pre-launch validation item, not a post-launch fix. ## Workflow risk: why B2B approval flows break more often than technical teams expect B2B purchase approval workflows are among the most complex features on a commerce platform and among the least visible during technical migration testing. A technical test confirms that the workflow builder tool exists in the new platform and that a sample workflow can be created. It does not confirm that the specific approval chains used by specific buyer accounts, with their specific approver assignments, dollar thresholds, and exception handling rules, migrated correctly. The buyers who rely on these workflows are enterprise accounts whose procurement teams require documented approval for every purchase order. They will not discover the workflow is broken until they attempt to route a purchase for approval and either the request disappears or the approval step is bypassed entirely. For context on how these workflows connect to the broader buyer experience, [B2B RFQ and quote workflow architecture](https://blog.miva.com/b2b-ecommerce-rfq-quote-workflow) covers how quoting and approval flows interact in enterprise B2B accounts. The pre-launch requirement is to map every approval workflow in the legacy platform before migration begins, assign a test buyer account to each workflow, and run a full approval cycle end-to-end in the new environment before launch. For enterprise accounts, the business should obtain explicit confirmation from the account's procurement contact that their workflow is functional before the cutover date. An enterprise buyer who discovers a broken approval workflow after launch and was not consulted during migration is a churn risk, not a support ticket. ## SEO risk: how URL migration destroys organic traffic and how long recovery takes Organic search traffic to B2B ecommerce sites represents a disproportionate share of inbound revenue because B2B buyers research purchases extensively before contacting a supplier. A product category page that ranks on the first page of search results for a relevant commercial query generates qualified inbound traffic every day without additional marketing spend. When that URL changes during a platform migration and the redirect is incomplete, incorrect, or absent, the page's search ranking degrades. For large product catalog migrations where hundreds or thousands of URLs change simultaneously, the aggregate traffic loss can be substantial. The mechanics of this risk are covered in detail in the [ecommerce SEO for large product catalogs](https://blog.miva.com/ecommerce-seo-large-product-catalog) guide, but the migration-specific implication is that redirect coverage must be treated as a launch-blocking requirement, not a post-launch cleanup task. The recovery timeline for post-migration SEO traffic loss is not a fixed number. It depends on redirect coverage, the authority of the pages affected, and how quickly search engines re-crawl the site after launch. Conservative estimates from ecommerce migration case studies put recovery at 6 to 18 months for sites with incomplete redirect coverage. For a B2B site generating $4M annually from organic search, even a 25% traffic decline during a 12-month recovery period represents $1M in revenue tied directly to an avoidable technical oversight.   | **Redirect coverage is a launch-blocking requirement, not a post-launch cleanup item.** The most common replatforming mistake is treating URL redirects as something to finish after launch while the technical team focuses on go-live stability. Every day a legacy URL returns a 404 error instead of redirecting to its new destination is a day that URL is losing search ranking. For pages that ranked well before migration, the loss accumulates during the post-launch period and creates a recovery curve that starts the moment of launch, not the moment redirects are finally implemented. Redirect coverage must be 100% validated before the domain switches. If it is not, delay the launch. | | --- | ## Integration risk: what breaks when ERP and EDI connections are not tested under real load B2B ecommerce platforms operate within an integration ecosystem that most consumer ecommerce platforms do not encounter at the same scale. ERP connections synchronize inventory quantities and pricing. EDI integrations transmit order confirmations and advance ship notices to buyers who require electronic document exchange as a condition of their supplier relationship. Warehouse management systems receive pick-pack-ship instructions. Each of these connections was configured against the legacy platform's API structure. When the platform changes, the API structure changes, and every integration must be rebuilt and tested. The failure mode is not that integrations break visibly. It is that they break silently. An ERP connection that is returning stale inventory data does not generate an error message visible to buyers. It generates orders for products that are out of stock, because the storefront is showing inventory numbers from the last successful sync rather than current warehouse levels. An EDI integration that stops transmitting order confirmations does not generate a visible alert on the commerce platform. It generates phone calls from buyers whose procurement systems show open purchase orders with no confirmation status, who assume their orders were not received. Integration testing requires volume. A test that confirms an ERP connection works for one transaction does not confirm it works for 200 simultaneous transactions during a Tuesday morning order rush. The pre-launch standard is to run every integration against realistic transaction volume, not just functional spot checks. For B2B merchants who manage customer-specific pricing at the integration level, pricing data flowing from ERP to storefront should be validated using the same buyer account login tests described in the revenue risk category above. The connection between integration reliability and [ecommerce checkout performance](https://blog.miva.com/ecommerce-checkout-optimization) is direct: a buyer who gets to checkout and encounters a shipping calculation error from a broken API will not retry the order. They will call their account manager. ## What a protected B2B migration looks like in practice   | **Illustrative example: B2B industrial distributor replatforming with zero revenue disruption** A B2B industrial distributor with 22,000 active SKUs, 1,400 buyer accounts across 180 companies, and a mix of direct pricing, volume-tiered pricing, and contract-specific pricing completed a platform migration over 14 months with no measurable revenue decline in the 90 days following launch. The migration was scoped from day one as a business operations project. Before any technical migration work began, the team documented every custom pricing structure, every approval workflow, every URL in the existing product and category taxonomy, and every integration connecting the platform to external systems. Each item was assigned a named owner and a pre-launch validation test. Pricing was validated by logging in as 47 representative buyer accounts across every pricing tier and confirming cart pricing on 10 products per account before launch. Approval workflows were tested end-to-end with real buyer accounts, and sign-off was obtained from the procurement contact at every enterprise account using approval routing. Redirect coverage was validated using an automated crawler against a complete export of indexed URLs, with zero uncovered URLs permitted on launch day. Every integration ran 500 test transactions before the cutover date. The migration launched on schedule. First-month revenue on the new platform was within 2% of the same month in the prior year. Results are illustrative of outcomes achievable with this methodology. Actual results vary by merchant. | | --- | ## Frequently asked questions about B2B ecommerce replatforming   | Q: How long does a B2B ecommerce replatforming project take? B2B replatforming timelines vary significantly based on catalog size, integration complexity, and the extent of custom pricing and workflow configurations that must be rebuilt. Simple B2B migrations with standard integrations typically run 4 to 6 months. Migrations involving large catalogs, extensive ERP integrations, EDI connections for multiple enterprise accounts, and complex approval workflows more commonly run 9 to 18 months. The timeline is driven by integration testing and buyer account validation requirements, not by the technical migration of data and content. Q: What is the biggest risk in a B2B platform migration? The most commercially damaging risk is account-level pricing failure: buyers logging in after launch and finding their negotiated pricing has reverted to list price. This is the most common cause of post-launch revenue disruption in B2B migrations because technical teams validate that pricing rules migrated correctly without validating that buyer-level pricing resolved correctly for representative accounts. The fix requires a pre-launch login test across buyer accounts at every pricing tier, not a spot check of pricing rule configuration. Q: How do you protect organic search traffic during an ecommerce migration? Redirect coverage is the primary lever for protecting organic search traffic during a URL migration. Every URL indexed by search engines on the legacy platform must redirect to its exact equivalent on the new platform before launch. The redirect must return a 301 (permanent redirect) status code, must complete in a single hop without redirect chains, and must point to the correct destination page rather than a generic homepage or category root. Redirect coverage should be validated using an automated crawler against a complete export of indexed legacy URLs before the domain switches, not after. Q: How do you migrate B2B pricing without losing customer-specific rates? Customer-specific pricing in B2B ecommerce is typically stored as account overrides, customer group assignments, or contract records that exist independently of the standard pricing structure. Migration requires exporting each pricing record from the legacy platform, mapping it to the corresponding account structure in the new platform, importing it into the new pricing engine, and validating it by logging in as representative buyer accounts and confirming cart prices. Assuming that pricing rule migration implies correct buyer-level pricing resolution is the most common error in B2B platform migrations. Q: When should a B2B ecommerce business consider replatforming? The primary replatforming triggers in B2B ecommerce are platform limitations that prevent the business from executing its commercial strategy: inability to support the pricing complexity required by the account base, absence of buyer portal features that enterprise accounts require, integration architecture that cannot connect reliably to ERP or EDI systems, or performance and scalability constraints that affect buyer experience during high-volume periods. Replatforming should not be triggered by aesthetic preferences or feature lists. It should be triggered by documented commercial limitations that the current platform cannot address. | | --- | ## How Miva supports B2B ecommerce migrations Miva's B2B commerce infrastructure supports the account structures, pricing configurations, approval workflows, and integration frameworks that B2B migrations must preserve and rebuild. Merchants migrating to Miva have access to customer group management for pricing tier implementation, configurable purchase approval routing, and API architecture that supports ERP and EDI integration at the transaction volumes B2B distributors and manufacturers require. For merchants evaluating replatforming, [Miva case studies](https://www.miva.com/case-studies) include B2B migration examples across distribution, manufacturing, and specialty retail categories. To review how Miva's platform handles the specific pricing, workflow, and integration requirements of a migration from your current platform, [schedule a demo](https://www.miva.com/schedule-demo-admin) with the commerce team. [Back to top](https://blog.miva.com/b2b-ecommerce-replatforming-why-most-migrations-fail-before-launch#postAnchor) ### Want to read this blog offline? No worries, download the PDF version now and enjoy your reading later... Download PDF ![Image of Lucinda Miller.](https://blog.miva.com/hubfs/image%20(18).png) Lucinda Miller Visit Website ![White Miva, Inc logo.](https://www.miva.com/images/logos/miva-type-white.svg) Powering the Next Era of Intelligent, Connected Commerce. [Get Pricing](https://www.miva.com/schedule-demo-admin) - [![White Facebook logo.](https://www.miva.com/images/svg/icons/icon-white-facebook.svg)](https://www.miva.com/social/facebook) - [![White X logo.](https://www.miva.com/images/svg/icons/icon-white-x.svg)](https://www.miva.com/social/x) - [![White LinkedIn logo.](https://www.miva.com/images/svg/icons/icon-white-linkedin.svg)](https://www.miva.com/social/linkedin) - [![White Instagram logo.](https://www.miva.com/images/svg/icons/icon-white-instagram.svg)](https://www.miva.com/social/instagram) ![Badge displaying that Miva was named Best Ecommerce Platform in 2020 by Vendors In Partnership.](https://www.miva.com/images/badges/best-ecomm-platform-2020.webp) - Solutions - [Why Miva](https://www.miva.com/why-miva) - [Platform Overview](https://www.miva.com/platform-overview) - [Miva Connect](https://www.miva.com/miva-connect) - [Vexture](https://www.miva.com/vexture) - [PageBuilder](https://www.miva.com/pagebuilder) - [MivaPay](https://www.miva.com/mivapay) - [MultiStorefront](https://www.miva.com/miva-multistorefront) - Business Type - [B2B](https://www.miva.com/b2b-ecommerce) - [B2C](https://www.miva.com/b2c-ecommerce-platform) - [Hybrid](https://www.miva.com/b2b-dtc-ecommerce-platform) - Community - [Customer Stories](https://www.miva.com/customer-stories) - [Technology Partners](https://www.miva.com/partners) - [Agency Partners](https://www.miva.com/miva-agency-partners) - [Forums](https://www.miva.com/forums/) - Resources - [Resource Center](https://www.miva.com/ecommerce-strategy-resource-guides) - [Blog](https://blog.miva.com/) - [Documentation](https://docs.miva.com/) - [App Store](https://apps.miva.com/) - [Miva Releases](https://www.miva.com/product-releases) - Compare Miva - [With Shopify](https://www.miva.com/miva-vs-shopify-plus) - [With BigCommerce](https://www.miva.com/miva-vs-bigcommerce) - [With Adobe Commerce (Magento)](https://www.miva.com/miva-vs-adobe-commerce-magento) - [With Salesforce Commerce](https://www.miva.com/miva-vs-salesforce-commerce) - Company - [About](https://www.miva.com/company) - [Leadership](https://www.miva.com/company/leadership) - [Diversity & Inclusion](https://www.miva.com/company/diversity-inclusion) - [Careers](https://www.miva.com/company/careers) - [Press Center](https://www.miva.com/press/) Copyright © 1997 – 2026 Miva®, Miva Merchant®, MivaPay®, Camp Miva®, Miva Connect®, Vexture®, Miva, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms & Policies - [Privacy Policy](https://www.miva.com/privacy) - [Cookie Policy](https://www.miva.com/cookie-policy) - [Job Applicants Privacy](https://www.miva.com/miva-applicant-privacy-notice) - [Intellectual Property](https://www.miva.com/intellectualproperty) - [Terms of Service](https://www.miva.com/pdf/SaaS_TOS.pdf) - [Non-Compliance Policy](https://www.miva.com/miva-software-updates) ```json { "@context" : "https://schema.org", "@id" : "https://blog.miva.com/b2b-ecommerce-replatforming-why-most-migrations-fail-before-launch#webpage", "@type" : "WebPage", "description" : "B2B replatforming projects fail because teams scope them as technology projects. The four migration risk categories that protect revenue through the cutover.", "inLanguage" : "en-US", "isPartOf" : { "@id" : "https://blog.miva.com/#website" }, "name" : "B2B Ecommerce Replatforming: Why Most Migrations Fail Before Launch", "url" : "https://blog.miva.com/b2b-ecommerce-replatforming-why-most-migrations-fail-before-launch" } ``` ```json { "@context" : "https://schema.org", "@type" : "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement" : [ { "@type" : "ListItem", "item" : "https://www.miva.com/", "name" : "Home", "position" : 1 }, { "@type" : "ListItem", "item" : "https://blog.miva.com/", "name" : "Blog", "position" : 2 }, { "@type" : "ListItem", "item" : "https://blog.miva.com/b2b-ecommerce-replatforming-why-most-migrations-fail-before-launch", "name" : "B2B Ecommerce Replatforming: Why Most Migrations Fail Before Launch", "position" : 3 } ] } ``` ```json { "@context" : "https://schema.org", "@type" : "BlogPosting", "author" : { "@type" : "Person", "name" : "Lucinda Miller", "url" : "https://blog.miva.com/author/lucinda-miller" }, "dateModified" : "1791896402091", "datePublished" : "2026-10-13 06:00:02", "description" : "B2B replatforming projects fail because teams scope them as technology projects. The four migration risk categories that protect revenue through the cutover.", "headline" : "B2B Ecommerce Replatforming: Why Most Migrations Fail Before Launch", "image" : { "@type" : "ImageObject", "height" : 630, "url" : "https://go.miva.com/hubfs/b2b-ecommerce-replatforming.webp", "width" : 1200 }, "mainEntityOfPage" : { "@id" : "https://blog.miva.com/b2b-ecommerce-replatforming-why-most-migrations-fail-before-launch#webpage", "@type" : "WebPage" }, "publisher" : { "@type" : "Organization", "logo" : { "@type" : "ImageObject", "height" : 60, "url" : "https://www.miva.com/images/new-images/mivainc-logo.png", "width" : 300 }, "name" : "Miva", "url" : "https://www.miva.com/" }, "url" : "https://blog.miva.com/b2b-ecommerce-replatforming-why-most-migrations-fail-before-launch" } ```